There
are a multiple of different definitions for the words “Hero” and “Stooge”, so
it makes it pretty frustrating on what the two words really mean. In the
dictionary, the word “Hero” means a person that is admired for his courage or
ability and his noble qualities. In a personal preference, hero would mean a
person that has made a positive impact on society or in the lives of others.
For the word stooge, the dictionary meaning would be a person who serves only
as an assist or support for others in wrong doings. In a personal preference,
stooge would mean a fool or an idiot from the context that it is used in. From
the definitions of these two words, John Proctor is closer to the hero’s
definition compared to the stooge definition.
I’m
sorry make this blog post really boring, even if it isn’t still, the tone of
the whole blog right now is just gloomy and sounds like I don’t like to be
doing this, but I mean this is homework so it isn’t that really fun. In order to
raise the tone of this blog, I need to have you; the reader read this in a
really funny manner or in an upbeat manner, you can use accents or use hand
motions when reading to make it interesting. This is a blog! A place where
reading becomes fun and interesting and you learn…stuff.
Back
to the topic now, John Proctor in my opinion isn’t either a hero or a stooge.
In The Crucible, John Proctor didn’t stop the witch trials and didn’t save
anyone from dying from the witch trials, but one thing that he did do was that
he put the most effort into not only saving his wife Elizabeth Proctor from the
witch trials, but also all the other wives and towns people that were accused
of witchery. Most of the other men that had their wives accused of witchery by
the girls- Abigail Williams, Betty Parris, Susanna Walcott, Mercy Lewis, Mary
Warren, and the others, only tried to save their wives from getting hanged and
not the others wives that were accused of witchery. Bit selfish don’t you
think? The only way to avoid death of hanging for the accused victims was to
confess and say that you saw the devil, you signed the devil’s book, you sent
your spirits on innocent victims, now you want to be with God and want to walk
with Jesus, and you say that you saw so and so with the devil. This was really
the only evidence that you can use to save from death, since Salem, Massachusetts
during the times of the late 1600s is a theocracy (a system of government in
which the government is ruled in the name of God). A confessed person in Salem,
Massachusetts has more trust over someone that says that they have never sent
spirits on people in the town or either that they never worshipped the devil.
Why? Because now that you have confessed your sins and God has forgiven you, it
means that you will not lie anymore since now that you’re by the side of God
and you will help God fight off the devil that lurks within the townspeople. It
also means that you will not break the Ten Commandments since a true Christian doesn’t
do that. All the girls confessed that they have seen the devil, danced with him
and signed his book with their blood. They have also randomly accused another
person. Which I believe that the girls accused whoever they didn't like, or
either in some way stirred up hate for them and wanted to see them dead since
there is over 100 people in the town of Salem and they only chose that certain
person. Doing the confession to the high authorities of seeing the devil and
all, gave the accused victims of witchery or being with the devil a get out of
death card, which makes you a stooge to the girls because you are assisting them
in getting tension off of them for dancing in the woods by including more
people into the situation, and soon people will forget what the girls did in
the woods, which it was true. When death is involved, mostly every human being
will at some point lie or go against their religions laws to avoid death or pain. Would you want to die or
suffer pain for no apparent reason just because someone used you as a scapegoat?
Many people will say no and do whatever it takes to avoid it like the townspeople
and the girls, while some people will say yes because they either don’t want to
break their religions laws or believes that what they are doing is the best
option to stop the drama that is happening. For example, Rebecca Nurse didn't confess and decided to die as being honest and a true Christian than to live as
a liar, she wasn't a stooge. Same thing for John Proctor, John Proctor did say
that he will confess, which he did, but then he didn't want to live as being an
even not a good man, Since he already couldn't forgive himself for the committing
of adultery with Abigail Williams, and believed that his wife Elizabeth was
judging him for doing that, but really his heart was just thinking that his
wife Elizabeth was judging him. John Proctor doesn't consider himself to be a
good man, but his wife Elizabeth Proctor, well early on in the play, she didn't really consider him to be a really good man, but had a small shred of goodness,
but now she believes more that he has more than just a shred of goodness, but
he has a lot since he stood his ground and became honest and didn't become a
stooge for the girls like mostly everyone else that was blamed for witchery.
The standing of his ground and dying as a man that still has a shred of
goodness, was really all that John wanted, and he got that at the end of the
play. John Proctor wasn't a stooge or a hero but was closer as being considered
as a hero than a stooge. Since his wife Elizabeth and Rebecca Nurse did admire
his will to not lie to save his life.
I just love how you didn't listen to my advice. Off topic equals no good. Do not do it, that simple. However you make reasonable choice. You seem to argue between the choices he has made, in between hero and stooge. My opinion is the same as yours. You provide evidence, although you didn't cite (many of us didn't either). My main problem with this post: Off topic and too long. 500 should be the max for this post. Do not try to make it longer by talking about why it is so long and how tone has effects.
ReplyDeleteThank you
ReplyDeletewhy did you not answer the question but try to dodge the question like with saying he is not either a stooge or a hero but more like a hero than a stooge so he is a hero?
ReplyDelete